Aussie Legal Courts and Pregnant Employees
BNET Australia Contributors
Aussie Rules
Biography
BNET Australia Contributors
Brian Haverty is editorial director for CBS Interactive Australia and is responsible for the company's BNET and ZDNet Australia sites.
Robert Gerrish is a coach, author and professional speaker and the founder of Flying Solo, an Australian online community for solo business owners.
Melissa Lourenco is the HR manager for CBS Interactive in Australia.
Chris Golis is the author of The Humm Handbook: Lifting Your Level of Emotional Intelligence. He runs seminars and workshops on EQ.
Suzi Dafnis is Community Director of the Australian Businesswomen's Network.
Yvonne Adele helps organisations build a culture of ideas by teaching people at all levels to access their untapped creative thinking skills.
Here’s an interesting court case: a pregnant employee, who had used up all her sick leave entitlements, was given a written warning about her performance and then dismissed one week before she would have been entitled to 12 months unpaid maternity leave. Although the employer argued that her employment was terminated solely on account of her poor work performance (unreliable attendance, being behind in her workload and excessive personal use of telephone and Internet), the tribunal did not accept this version of events.
The tribunal found that the employer’s reasons for dismissal were unsubstantiated and exaggerated. There was not enough evidence to support the view that her performance was so bad as to warrant termination. The real reason for her dismissal, in the tribunal’s view, was that she had taken a lot of sick leave once pregnant, which made her an unreliable employee in the employer’s view. Terminating her employment before maternity leave amounted to discrimination on the ground of pregnancy. The tribunal awarded the dismissed employee approximately AU$10,500 in damages.
Firing employees is always a delicate thing, but for pregnant employees, employers must take special care in documenting performance issues so that they are not seen to be dismissing pregnant employees for invented, exaggerated or unsubstantiated reasons.
